# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 42

## Summary

- They share 42 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.5 to 44.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 52.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 28.7% for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 154 | 162 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 41.1 (#120)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | 28.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 55.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1424 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 41.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 661.88 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.9 (#46)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | 41.1% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 17.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 56.2% |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| BALROG | — | 33.5% |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 548.84 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.7 (#252)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | 2.5% |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | 41.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | 33.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | 2.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 143.04 |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | 60.6 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 56.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| LMCA | — | 27.5% |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 35.7 (#137)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 73.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1336 | 1415 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.7 (#117)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | 12.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | 63.9% |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | 16.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | 39% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1426 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.8% |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.1 (#90)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | 1254 |
| GeoBench | 68% | 76% |
| VPCT | 39% | 46.2% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | 36.9% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.3 (#174)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1433 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1419 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1299 | 1421 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 73.1 (#120)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.4% | 89.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1405 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.2 (#10)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.6 (#145)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1400 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | 76.5% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | 1137 |
| WildBench | 81.4% | 81.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1408 |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Flash better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?

42 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.