# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-0-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 48

## Summary

- They share 48 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 41.1 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 52.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 13.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 34.8 |
| Rank | 154 | 223 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 41.1 (#120)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 38.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | 63.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1351 |
| CadEval | 54% | 30% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.9 (#46)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | 11.4% |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.7 (#252)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | 31.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | 78.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1346 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | 66.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 63.2% |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 35.7 (#137)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1336 | 1351 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.7 (#117)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1340 |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.1 (#90)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | 68% | 77% |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.3 (#174)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | 1293 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1299 | 1363 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 73.1 (#120)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | 85.8% |
| IFEval | 83.4% | 84.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1336 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.2 (#10)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 61.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.6 (#145)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | 1128 |
| WildBench | 81.4% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1350 |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | 51.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?

48 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.