# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs ERNIE 5.1

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 55.5 to 44.1.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 164 | 83 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)
- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1481 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)
- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1492 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1508 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1460 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1462 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1471 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and ERNIE 5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.