# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Command R

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-command-r
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 8 categories and Command R in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 54.4 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 87.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 21.9% for Command R.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 164 | 272 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)
- Command R: 29.3 (#306)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | 17.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1169 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 45.2% |
| CadEval | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)
- Command R: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)
- Command R: 13.8 (#331)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | 21.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1164 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | 33.3% |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | 27.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| DTBench | — | 46.4% |
| LMCA | — | 9.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)
- Command R: 28.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 79% | 19.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1155 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)
- Command R: 31.0 (#221)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1138 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| MMLU | — | 65.2% |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)
- Command R: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)
- Command R: 35.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1174 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1182 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1162 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1176 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1143 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1163 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1174 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1151 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)
- Command R: 58.1 (#261)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1167 |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)
- Command R: 36.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1198 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)
- Command R: 38.2 (#254)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1170 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1163 |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | 16.7% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Command R?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Command R better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command R share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.