# Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 18.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.4 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 225 | 66 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1343 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 67.8% | 84% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 147.39 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1306 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1264 | 1467 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | 1281 |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1271 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1304 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1439 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1459 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.