# Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.1 in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.5 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 67.8% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 231 | 51 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 67.8% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 154.21 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1483 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | 1293 |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1464 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1457 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | 1927 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1485 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.