# Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 56.9% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 231 | 173 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | 63.5% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 59% | 65.1% |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.