# Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-claude-3-7-sonnet
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 50

## Summary

- They share 50 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Claude 3.7 Sonnet in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 37.5 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 57.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 231 | 164 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | 64.9% |
| GSO | 4.6% | 3.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | 74.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1361 |
| CadEval | 48% | 54% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 61% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 52.8% |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | 30.9% |
| Cybench | 17.5% | 20% |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | 60% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 43.6% |
| OSWorld | — | 35.8% |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | 46.4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | 4.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | 87.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | 74% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 141.16 |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | 61.8 |
| LiveBench | 59% | 76.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 28.6% |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | 33% |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | 79% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1337 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 91.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | 4.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 79.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | 8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | 78.4% |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | 14.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | 60.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1321 |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | 1169 |
| GeoBench | 62% | 68% |
| VPCT | 33% | 39% |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.9% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1296 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1299 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1303 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1301 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1267 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1311 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1298 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | 81.3% |
| IFEval | 85.5% | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1314 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1332 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | 81.1% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | 1412 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | 81.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1339 |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | 59.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3.7 Sonnet better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.7 Sonnet share?

50 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58.