# Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 14.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 315 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 27.4% | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | 54.1% |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 10% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 149.97 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | — |
| MMLU | 74.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | — |
| LMArena French | 1264 | — |
| LMArena German | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1173 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.