# Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 2B

> Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Haiku leads 42.9 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 309 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1010 |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 989 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 93.57 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1009 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 74.3% | 42.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1262 | — |
| LMArena German | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 971 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 945 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Gemma 2B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.6 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 2B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.