# Claude 2 vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 97.1% for Qwen3 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 342 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 20.8 (#213)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 82.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | 142.41 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |

## Math

- Claude 2: 8.7 (#314)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 17.0 (#282)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1479 |
| LMArena French | — | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen3 Max share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.