# Claude 2 vs Phi-3.5-mini

> Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#346); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 346 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#346); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.