# Claude 2 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 8.7.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 342 | 248 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 20.8 (#213)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2: 8.7 (#314)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 17.0 (#282)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.