# Claude 2 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 9.3.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 346 | 65 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1457 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1475 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1431 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1452 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.