# Claude 2 vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 33.1 to 9.3.
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 346 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1149 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1138 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1159 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.