# Claude 2 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

> Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-gemini-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.6 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 97.2% for Gemini 3.7 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 59.8 |
| Rank | 346 | 14 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 65.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 20.3% |
| SciCode | — | 59.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 904.3 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 67.8% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 5% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.8% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 96.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 157.27 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 84.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 94% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 95.5% |
| CritPt | — | 14.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 47% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1494 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 37% |
| LMCA | — | 50.4% |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 97.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 71.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 36.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1507 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 94.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1508 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1316 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1484 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1548 |
| LMArena French | — | 1505 |
| LMArena German | — | 1498 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1512 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1516 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1503 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1483 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1492 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1490 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1723 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.