# Claude 2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-gemini-2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 16.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 95.9% for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 346 | 75 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1452 |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 82.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 145.32 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1455 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 79.9% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 84.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 90.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1472 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1437 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 91.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1449 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1454 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1453 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 67.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.