# Claude 2 vs Claude Opus 4.7

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-vs-claude-opus-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.7 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 97.8% for Claude Opus 4.7.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 58.3 |
| Rank | 346 | 19 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $5 |
| Output $/M | — | $25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 83.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1558 |
| SciCode | — | 54.5% |
| GSO | — | 44.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 76.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1518 |
| MirrorCode | — | 31.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,323 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 49.2% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 18.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.2% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 28.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 43.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 21% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1233 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,937 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 94.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 156.25 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 75.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 80.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 93.5% |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 72.8% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 19% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1506 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 28% |
| LMCA | — | 52.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.3 |

## Math

- Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 70.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 73.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 54% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 43.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 22.9% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 90.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 36.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 51.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1521 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1316 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 24.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 33.3% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1495 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1480 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1531 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1494 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1495 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1498 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1505 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2: —
- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)

| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1490 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1486 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1914 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1505 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2 better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.