# Claude 2.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 50.6 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 93.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 340 | 54 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 81.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 147.67 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1449 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1456 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1440 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.