# Claude 2.1 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 40.1 to 10.2.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 345 | 71 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.