# Claude 2.1 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 35.9 to 25.8.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 340 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 47.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 118.44 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 35.5% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | 72.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.