# Claude 2.1 vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen Plus leads 38.3 to 25.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 81.1% for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 340 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 81.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.