# Claude 2.1 vs Phi-4 Mini

> Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 24.8 to 15.5.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 30.4 |
| Rank | 340 | 280 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Phi-4 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.