# Claude 2.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

> Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-phi-3-mini-4k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads 24.5 to 9.6.
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 340 | 324 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 15.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1093 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 26.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1072 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 34.7% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 52.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.7% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 70.8% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 15.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1111 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1045 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 64% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena French | — | 1075 |
| LMArena German | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 935 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 905 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1084 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 39.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1053 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1044 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1018 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 9.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (25.8 vs 26.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.