# Claude 2.1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE

> Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-phi-3-5-moe
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | — |
| Rank | 345 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Phi-3.5-MoE: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Phi-3.5-MoE: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Phi-3.5-MoE: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Phi-3.5-MoE: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.