# Claude 2.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 33.6 to 9.6.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 340 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.