# Claude 2.1 vs Ministral 8B

> Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-ministral-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Ministral 8B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 8B leads 23.7 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 27.1% for Ministral 8B.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 27.8 |
| Rank | 340 | 321 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1202 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 45.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.9% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1170 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1195 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1161 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1212 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1166 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Ministral 8B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.