# Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 36.4 to 9.6.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 340 | 91 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.