# Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 10.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 345 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.