# Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 35.4 to 9.6.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 340 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1459 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.