# Claude 2.1 vs Laguna M.1

> Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-laguna-m-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 20.3 to 9.6.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 340 | 252 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Laguna M.1?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.