# Claude 2.1 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 10.2.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 345 | 214 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1249 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1222 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1242 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1211 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1242 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.