# Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-hunyuan-standard
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 10.2.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 345 | 193 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.