# Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 9.6.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 340 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1286 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1276 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1266 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1342 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1284 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.