# Claude 2.1 vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 10.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 53.1 |
| Rank | 345 | 37 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 96% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 153.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1413 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 98.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Grok 4.7 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.