# Claude 2.1 vs Grok-3 mini

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-grok-3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 42.1 to 10.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 77.8% for Grok-3 mini.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 41.2 |
| Rank | 345 | 141 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | 42.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1379 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1375 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1386 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1381 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1357 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1372 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1342 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1355 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Grok-3 mini share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.