# Claude 2.1 vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

> Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-granite-3-0-8b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 32.8 to 10.2.
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 31.6 |
| Rank | 345 | 270 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 35.4% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1092 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1143 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1087 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1063 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1060 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1088 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1122 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1096 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1071 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1063 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.7 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.