# Claude 2.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 36.6 to 9.6.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 340 | 86 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1440 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1451 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 2.1: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1488 |
| LMArena French | — | 1443 |
| LMArena German | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1446 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1422 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1432 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.