# Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 7B

> Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 7B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 28.7 to 9.6.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 340 | 295 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 111.74 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1042 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 66.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1002 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 7B?

Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.