# Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 10.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 345 | 206 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1284 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.