# Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 3 4B

> Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3 4B leads 35.9 to 26.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 28.1 |
| Rank | 345 | 326 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1230 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 50.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 116.02 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1253 |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1239 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 23.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1273 |
| LMArena German | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1294 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1273 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1271 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1255 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 3 4B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.