# Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 2B

> Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 2B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2B leads 27.6 to 9.6.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 340 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 93.57 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 989 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 42.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 971 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 2B?

Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Gemma 2B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 2B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.