# Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 28.3 to 9.6.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 340 | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1011 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 958 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.