# Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 340 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.