# Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 1.0 Pro leads 32.2 to 26.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 27.3 |
| Rank | 345 | 332 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 34% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | 70% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.