# Claude 2.1 vs Command R+

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-2-1-vs-command-r-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Command R+ in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 15.4.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 345 | 257 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 19.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1187 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 41.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 63.5% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 54.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 119.34 |
| SimpleBench | — | 17.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 24.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1186 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 38.1% |
| LMCA | — | 5% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 31.8% |

## Math

- Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 21.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1188 |

## Knowledge

- Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 69.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1174 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 2.1: —
- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1226 |
| LMArena French | — | 1209 |
| LMArena German | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1189 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 2.1: —
- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 57.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1197 |

## Long Context

- Claude 2.1: —
- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1230 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 2.1: —
- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1229 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1235 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1213 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 29.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 2.1 better than Command R+?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 2.1 or Command R+ better for coding?

Command R+ scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Command R+ share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command R+ has 34.