# Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs GLM-4.6V

> Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/chatgpt-4o-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 32.8 to 26.5.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 84 | 133 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.0 (#122)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 32.8 (#64)
- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1368 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |

## Math

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 35.8 (#134)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | — |

## Knowledge

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.7 (#131)
- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1400 | 1372 |
| Confabulations | 16.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.9 (#54)
- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1243 | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 53.1 (#72)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1419 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1426 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1341 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1435 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.2 (#102)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1351 |

## Long Context

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#104)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.8 (#68)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1429 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1359 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1501 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than GLM-4.6V?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.0 vs 40.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.