# Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Claude Opus 4.8

> Claude Opus 4.8 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.7 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/chatgpt-4o-vs-claude-opus-4-8
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.8 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.8 leads 78.4 to 38.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 75% for Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and 88.8% for Claude Opus 4.8.

## Snapshot

| | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 60.7 |
| Rank | 82 | 13 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $5 |
| Output $/M | — | $25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 59.9 (#12)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1490 |
| DeepSWE | — | 59% |
| FrontierCode | — | 46.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1556 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| GSO | — | 47.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,564 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: —
- Claude Opus 4.8: 47.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 48.9% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 20.6% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 8.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 39.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 50.2% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 33.8% |
| GBAEval | — | 70.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 24% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,787 |

## Reasoning

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 64.7 (#16)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | 88.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1482 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 72.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 64.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 91.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 92.5% |
| CritPt | — | 20.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 34% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.5% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 28.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 36% |
| DTBench | — | 94.9% |
| LMCA | — | 57.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 87.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 158.21 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |

## Math

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 78.4 (#13)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1487 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 80% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 91.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 69% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 47.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 61.3 (#29)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1401 | 1502 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 91% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 53% |
| Confabulations | 16.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 42.9 (#26)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1243 | 1294 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 14.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 42.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1475 |

## Multilingual

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 55.2 (#33)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1419 | 1450 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1446 | 1481 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1472 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1440 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1432 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1474 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1466 |

## Instruction Following

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 77.4 (#24)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1476 |

## Long Context

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 72.0 (#16)

| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1429 | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1405 | 1454 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1501 | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1476 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1281 |

## FAQ

### Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.7 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Claude Opus 4.8 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Claude Opus 4.8 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.8 has 65.