# C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Command A

> C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/c4ai-aya-expanse-32b-vs-command-a
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 34.8 to 27.2.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 221 | 215 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231)
- Command A: 27.2 (#322)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1330 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: —
- Command A: 35.9 (#40)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 57.1% |

## Reasoning

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180)
- Command A: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1326 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LMCA | — | 10.3% |

## Math

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197)
- Command A: 36.2 (#171)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1300 |

## Knowledge

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206)
- Command A: 37.1 (#159)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230)
- Command A: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | 1351 |
| LMArena German | 1199 | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | 1285 |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | 1347 |

## Instruction Following

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237)
- Command A: 69.1 (#177)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1309 |

## Long Context

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220)
- Command A: 40.6 (#151)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1334 |

## Writing & Preference

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235)
- Command A: 47.6 (#208)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1331 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1339 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1145 |

## FAQ

### Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Command A?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Command A better for coding?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.