# C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Codestral

> C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/c4ai-aya-expanse-32b-vs-codestral
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 34.3 to 26.9.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 216 | 287 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.3 (#227)
- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 11.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 137.78 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 73.8% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.9% |

## Reasoning

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 22.3 (#183)
- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 32.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |

## Math

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 31.4 (#195)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |

## Knowledge

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 32.6 (#202)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |

## Multilingual

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.5 (#225)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1210 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |

## Instruction Following

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.9 (#232)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |

## Long Context

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#215)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.4 (#230)
- Codestral: —

| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |

## FAQ

### Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Codestral?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Codestral better for coding?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.3 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Codestral share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Codestral has 7.